Evaluating Global Issues with Limited AI Use

Adapted from: Courses on Political Science, Ethics, and Sociology.

Purpose

This assignment encourages students to independently explore and evaluate the complex interdependence of global issues using a multidisciplinary approach.

By synthesizing cultural, historical, and contextual insights, students will engage in critical thinking, ethical reasoning, and reflective analysis to develop a deeper understanding of global challenges. This assignment emphasizes the human ability to evaluate diverse perspectives and communicate meaningful responses, fostering skills aligned with Bloom’s higher-order domains of evaluation and synthesis.

Learning Outcomes

• Evaluate the context, cultural dynamics, and implications of global issues using multidisciplinary approaches.
• Synthesize research findings into a coherent analysis and effective response proposals.
• Communicate insights through a detailed report and creative representation.

Instructions

Written Report and Panel Discussion/Visual Art Exhibition

1. Virtual Field Study
   • Select a region and global issue of interest (e.g., climate change, economic inequality, conflict).
   • Use digital resources such as satellite imagery, news reports, and videos to gather data on:
     • Context and geographical features
     • People involved and directly affected
     • Characteristics and implications of the global issue
     • Cultural dynamics and multidisciplinary approaches
2. Analysis Report
   • Write an 8-page analysis report including:
     • Introduction and purpose statement
     • Context and population of the global issue
     • Impact, implications, and approaches to address the issue
     • Reflection on the field study’s significance and ramifications for other regions.
   • Add images or links to illustrate examples.
3. Panel Discussion or Visual Art
   • Create a 3-minute video presentation or a 3-slide collage summarizing your report and reflection.
   • Include a discussion question derived from your field research and analysis.
   • Post the video or visual art on the Panel Discussion board for peer engagement.
4. Restrictions on AI Use
   • Generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT) are strongly discouraged.
   • Submit evidence of Writing Center consultations to support your process.

Grading Criteria

• Depth and relevance of analysis (40%)
• Quality and clarity of the written report (30%)
• Creativity and engagement in the presentation (20%)
• Adherence to guidelines limiting AI use (10%)

Resources

• Writing Center consultations for drafting and revising the report.
• Zoom recording guidelines for video presentations.